ITM is an open framework - Submit your contributions now.

Insider Threat Matrix™

  • ID: DT143
  • Created: 03rd September 2025
  • Updated: 03rd September 2025
  • Contributor: Richard Biolette

Automated Visual and Thermal Baseline Scanning of Server Environments

In high-sensitivity physical environments such as data centers, battery banks, and server rooms, environmental consistency is a critical security signal. Unexplained physical changes—such as added devices, modified cable routing, or thermal anomalies—may indicate preparatory activity by a subject intending to exfiltrate data, introduce malicious hardware, or compromise critical infrastructure.

 

Automated visual and thermal baseline scanning provides a scalable method to detect such changes by comparing real-time camera feeds to historical baselines. This technique extends the concept of "known good state" into the physical realm, enabling early identification of unauthorized modifications before they result in policy violations or technical compromise.

 

Methods of implementation

 

Autonomous Environmental Scanning Systems: 

Deploy robotic or fixed-position platforms capable of capturing high-resolution visual and thermal imagery at defined intervals. These systems should be configured to scan static components (e.g., server racks, power units, fire suppression systems, cable bundles, and access panels) from consistent angles and distances.

 

Baseline Comparison Algorithms: 

Implement software that compares each new scan to a stored baseline image set. Visual deviation detection should include object placement, cable routing, connected device presence (e.g., USB or external drives), and enclosure status (open vs. closed). Thermal deviation detection should identify abnormal heat signatures on batteries, processors, fans, or power supplies—indicative of tampering, overload, or early-stage failure.

 

Alert Routing and Escalation: 

Flag deviations beyond a defined threshold for human validation. Route alerts to a live remote operator who can verify anomalies and determine whether an onsite response is required. Escalation should trigger access reviews, subject correlation (e.g., badge scans or door logs), and containment measures if sabotage or preparatory behavior is suspected.

 

Targeted Focus Zones

 

Prioritize static components that are unlikely to change under normal operational procedures. These include:

  • Server rack front and rear panels
  • Electrical panels and circuit breakers
  • UPS units and cooling systems
  • Cable trays and conduit paths
  • High-value compute or storage nodes

 

Anomaly Logging and Cross-Referencing: 

Record each scan result, deviation instance, and operator decision for later forensic analysis. Integrate with physical access systems to correlate anomalies with subject presence.

Sections

ID Name Description
ME024.005Access to Physical Spaces

Subjects with authorized access to sensitive physical spaces—such as secure offices, executive areas, data centers, SCIFs (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities), R&D labs, or restricted zones in critical infrastructure—pose an increased insider threat due to their physical proximity to sensitive assets, systems, and information.

 

Such spaces often contain high-value materials or information, including printed sensitive documents, whiteboard plans, authentication devices (e.g., smartcards or tokens), and unattended workstations. A subject with physical presence in these locations may observe confidential conversations, access sensitive output, or physically interact with devices outside of typical security monitoring.

 

This type of access can be leveraged to:

  • Obtain unattended or discarded sensitive information, such as printouts, notes, or credentials left on desks.
  • Observe operational activity or decision-making, gaining insight into projects, personnel, or internal dynamics.
  • Access unlocked devices or improperly secured terminals, allowing direct system interaction or credential harvesting.
  • Bypass digital controls via physical means, such as tailgating into secure spaces or using misappropriated access cards.
  • Covertly install or remove equipment, such as data exfiltration tools, recording devices, or physical implants.
  • Eavesdrop on confidential conversations, either directly or through concealed recording equipment, enabling the collection of sensitive verbal disclosures, strategic discussions, or authentication procedures.

 

Subjects in roles that involve frequent presence in sensitive locations—such as cleaning staff, security personnel, on-site engineers, or facility contractors—may operate outside the scope of standard digital access control and may not be fully visible to security teams focused on network activity.

 

Importantly, individuals with this kind of access are also potential targets for recruitment or coercion by external threat actors seeking insider assistance. The ability to physically access secure environments and passively gather high-value information makes them attractive assets in coordinated attempts to obtain or compromise protected information.

 

The risk is magnified in organizations lacking comprehensive physical access policies, surveillance, or cross-referencing of physical and digital access activity. When unmonitored, physical access can provide a silent pathway to support insider operations without leaving traditional digital footprints.

ME024.004Access to Physical Hardware

Subjects with physical access to critical hardware—such as data center infrastructure, on-premises servers, network appliances, storage arrays, or specialized equipment like CCTV and alarm systems—represent a significant insider threat due to their ability to bypass logical controls and interact directly with systems. This level of access can facilitate a wide range of security compromises, many of which are difficult to detect through conventional digital monitoring.

 

Physical access may also include proximity to sensitive areas such as network closets, on-premises server racks, backup repositories, or control systems in operational technology (OT) environments. In high-security settings, even brief unsupervised access can be exploited to compromise system integrity or enable ongoing unauthorized access.

 

With this type of access, a subject can:

  • Extract or clone drives and media for offline analysis or exfiltration of sensitive data, including proprietary documents, logs, authentication secrets, and configuration files.
  • Introduce malicious hardware or firmware, such as USB-based keyloggers, hardware implants, or modified components that persist beyond reboots and may evade traditional endpoint protections.
  • Bypass access controls by booting from external media, altering BIOS or UEFI settings, or resetting system passwords using direct hardware manipulation.
  • Install or modify software directly on the system, enabling surveillance tools, remote access backdoors, or malicious code that blends in with legitimate system processes.
  • Capture network traffic by tapping physical interfaces or inserting intermediary devices such as portable switches, protocol analyzers, or rogue wireless access points.
  • Disable security mechanisms, such as disconnecting monitoring systems, tampering with surveillance equipment, or disabling redundant power and failover systems to induce outages.

 

In operational environments, subjects with access to physical control systems (e.g., ICS/SCADA components, industrial HMIs, or IoT gateways) may alter processes, cause service disruptions, or create safety hazards. Similarly, access to CCTV or badge systems may allow them to erase footage, monitor employee movements, or manipulate access control logs.

 

Subjects with this form of access represent an elevated risk, especially when combined with technical knowledge or administrative privileges. The risk is compounded in environments with limited physical security controls, inadequate logging of physical entry, or weak segmentation between physical and digital assets.

IF026.001Internal Denial of Service

The subject initiates actions that degrade, overwhelm, or disable internal services, applications, or systems, denying legitimate access. These incidents may involve:
 

  • Excessive or malformed queries to internal databases
  • Overuse of automated scripts against internal APIs or systems
  • Misconfiguration or manual tampering with internal service dependencies (e.g., message queues, schedulers)
  • Saturation of internal network bandwidth or I/O on shared infrastructure