Anti-Forensics
Account Misuse
Audit Trail Saturation
Clear Browser Artifacts
Clear Email Artifacts
Code Contribution Obfuscation and Misrepresentation
Cross-System Activity Fragmentation
Decrease Privileges
Delayed Execution Triggers
Delete User Account
Deletion of Volume Shadow Copy
Disable Logging
Disk Wiping
File Deletion
File Encryption
Hide Artifacts
Hiding or Destroying Command History
Incremental Data Collection
Investigative Deception
Log Deletion
Log Modification
Message Deletion
Message Modification
Modify Windows Registry
Network Obfuscation
Parent Process ID Spoofing
Physical Destruction of Storage Media
Physical Removal of Disk Storage
Retention Window Exploitation
Rootkit
Stalling
Steganography
System Shutdown
System Time Modification
Timestomping
Tripwires
Trusted Tool Misuse
Uninstalling Software
Virtualization
- ID: AF042.001
- Created: 07th November 2026
- Updated: 07th November 2026
- Contributor: The ITM Team
False Statements to Investigators
A subject knowingly provides materially false factual statements during an internal or external inquiry concerning the subject's activity or relevant evidence. The statements may be made to insider threat investigators, incident responders, auditors, Human Resources, Legal, regulators, or law enforcement. They may concern actions performed, access exercised, instructions received, communications exchanged, information retained, or the existence and location of relevant artifacts. The defining behavior is an affirmative factual representation that the subject knows is false and supplies to mislead the inquiry.
The false statement may deny an action, invent authorization, misrepresent the purpose of a transfer, or provide a false explanation for possession of information or use of a service. It may be provided verbally, in a written response, or through a record submitted for investigative review. Investigators should distinguish a demonstrably false statement from an unsupported statement, an incomplete recollection, or an account that changes following clarification. Establishing that a statement conflicts with a record is a starting point, classification also requires evidence that the subject knew the statement was false when it was made.