Anti-Forensics
Account Misuse
Clear Browser Artifacts
Clear Email Artifacts
Decrease Privileges
Delayed Execution Triggers
Delete User Account
Deletion of Volume Shadow Copy
Disk Wiping
File Deletion
File Encryption
Hide Artifacts
Hiding or Destroying Command History
Log Deletion
Log Modification
Modify Windows Registry
Network Obfuscation
Physical Destruction of Storage Media
Physical Removal of Disk Storage
Stalling
Steganography
System Shutdown
Timestomping
Tripwires
Uninstalling Software
Virtualization
Windows System Time Modification
- ID: AF024.001
- Created: 16th July 2025
- Updated: 22nd October 2025
- Contributor: Ryan Bellows
Account Obfuscation
The subject leverages multiple accounts under their control—each legitimate on its own—to distribute, disguise, or segment activity in a manner that defeats identity-based attribution. This technique, referred to as account obfuscation, is designed to frustrate forensic correlation between subject behavior and account usage.
Unlike role-sanctioned multi-account use (e.g., one account for user access, another for administrative tasks), account obfuscation involves the deliberate operational separation of actions across identities to conceal intent, evade controls, or introduce ambiguity. This may involve:
- Using a privileged account to perform high-risk or policy-violating actions while maintaining a clean audit trail on the primary user account.
- Staging data using an internal identity and exfiltrating it using an external or contractor credential.
- Alternating between corporate and guest accounts to avoid continuous session logging or alerting thresholds.
This behavior is often facilitated by weak identity governance, fragmented access models, or unmanaged role transitions. It is especially difficult to detect in environments where access provisioning is ad hoc, audit scopes are limited, or account correlation is not enforced at the SIEM or UAM level.
From an investigative standpoint, account obfuscation serves as a deliberate anti-forensics tactic—enabling subjects to operate with plausible deniability and complicating timeline reconstruction. Investigators should review cross-account behavior patterns, concurrent session overlaps, and role-permission inconsistencies when this technique is suspected.