Infringement
Account Sharing
Data Loss
Denial of Service
Disruption of Business Operations
Excessive Personal Use
Exfiltration via Email
Exfiltration via Media Capture
Exfiltration via Messaging Applications
Exfiltration via Other Network Medium
Exfiltration via Physical Medium
- Exfiltration via Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)
- Exfiltration via Disk Media
- Exfiltration via Floppy Disk
- Exfiltration via New Internal Drive
- Exfiltration via Physical Access to System Drive
- Exfiltration via Physical Documents
- Exfiltration via Target Disk Mode
- Exfiltration via USB Mass Storage Device
- Exfiltration via USB to Mobile Device
- Exfiltration via USB to USB Data Transfer
Exfiltration via Screen Sharing
Exfiltration via Web Service
Harassment and Discrimination
Inappropriate Web Browsing
Installing Malicious Software
Installing Unapproved Software
Misappropriation of Funds
Non-Corporate Device
Providing Access to a Unauthorized Third Party
Public Statements Resulting in Brand Damage
Regulatory Non-Compliance
Sharing on AI Chatbot Platforms
Theft
Unauthorized Changes to IT Systems
Unauthorized Printing of Documents
Unauthorized VPN Client
Unlawfully Accessing Copyrighted Material
- ID: IF016.009
- Created: 23rd November 2025
- Updated: 23rd November 2025
- Contributor: The ITM Team
Creation of Fictitious Work Orders
The subject generates falsified internal work orders to simulate legitimate business activity, enabling unauthorized payments, resource allocation, or personal financial gain. These work orders are typically entered into official systems (e.g., procurement, HR, or service management platforms) and may reference real vendors or fictitious entities created by the subject.
Unlike invoice fraud, which occurs at the point of payment, this behavior targets the earlier procedural layer, embedding false tasks, contracts, or justifications into the organization’s internal operations. It is often used to pre-authorize expenditures or create documentation trails that appear procedurally valid.
Work order fabrication may be episodic or sustained, and is especially difficult to detect in high-trust environments or when the subject holds procurement authority. The behavior may surface during internal audits, budget discrepancies, or when a pattern of unusually consistent approvals is noticed across unrelated departments or timeframes.